On 10/20/2011 01:46 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
From: Roopa Prabhu<ropra...@cisco.com>
Fixes some cases where 1 was being returned instead of -1.
There are still some inconsistencies in the file with respect
to what the return variable is initialized to. Can be fixed
as a separate patch if needed. The scope of this patch is just
to fix the return value 1. Did some basic sanity test.
Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu<ropra...@cisco.com>
Reported-by: Eric Blake<ebl...@redhat.com>
---
src/util/macvtap.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/macvtap.c b/src/util/macvtap.c
index 7fd6eb5..f8b9d55 100644
--- a/src/util/macvtap.c
+++ b/src/util/macvtap.c
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ getPortProfileStatus(struct nlattr **tb, int32_t vf,
bool is8021Qbg,
uint16_t *status)
{
- int rc = 1;
+ int rc = -1;
const char *msg = NULL;
struct nlattr *tb_port[IFLA_PORT_MAX + 1] = { NULL, };
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ doPortProfileOpCommon(bool nltarget_kernel,
_("error %d during port-profile setlink on "
"interface %s (%d)"),
status, ifname, ifindex);
- rc = 1;
+ rc = -1;
break;
}
In this function we later on return a -ETIMEDOUT. The -1 doesn't overlap
with it, but I am wondering whether we should return -EFAULT in the
places of -1 now ?
Stefan
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
