On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 01:02:28AM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Christophe Fergeau
> <cferg...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Reading this patch, I'm wondering if gvir_domain_set_config might achieve
> > what you are after (it's not implemented either)
>
> Yeah, that might actually be better.
>
>
> >> + GVirConnectionPrivate *priv = conn->priv;
> >> +
> >> + xml = gvir_config_object_to_xml(GVIR_CONFIG_OBJECT(conf));
> >> +
> >> + g_return_if_fail(xml != NULL);
> >> +
> >> + g_mutex_lock(priv->lock);
> >> + dom = g_hash_table_lookup (priv->domains,
> >> + (gpointer)gvir_domain_get_uuid(domain));
> >> + g_mutex_unlock(priv->lock);
> >> + g_return_if_fail(dom != NULL);
> >> + /* FIXME: Check if config's domain ID is the same as domain passed */
> >> +
> >> + if (!(handle = virDomainDefineXML(priv->conn, xml))) {
> >
> > Shouldn't handle be assigned to some persistent state? My guess is
> > domain->priv->handle.
>
> No, there is supposed to be already a corresponding domain with the
> handle in hash table. Don't let the 'DomainDefineXML' name fool you.No need for the handle variable then. This is one of the things that fooled me :) Christophe
pgpSNZJXy8LNy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
