On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) <zeesha...@gnome.org>wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) > <zeesha...@gnome.org> wrote: > > From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeesha...@gnome.org> > > + res = g_simple_async_result_new(G_OBJECT(dom), > > + callback, > > + user_data, > > + gvir_domain_saved_suspend); > > + g_simple_async_result_set_op_res_gpointer (res, data, NULL); > > The reason I'm not using destroy notify argument here is that I > can't: g_slice_free*() takes 2 arguments and thats not what > DestroyNotify expects. I could write a wrapper function but I don't > see the point. Oh, I see. Perhaps we don't need gslice then. fyi, none of the gio data structs used in this case are allocated with gslice . Tbh, I think it's better having the small wrapper if we keep gslice. -- Marc-André Lureau
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list