On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cferg...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:08:10PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 11:38:15PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cferg...@redhat.com> >> > wrote: >> > > There are some devices which we are not able to parse yet, in these >> > > cases a runtime warning is printed to tell what's going on. >> > >> > Actually I see that most of the device types are not being handled. >> > I would suggest we implement all the cases before merging this or >> > otherwise we'll easily forget about this. Yes the warning won't let us >> > forget but I don't think emitting a warning for each unimplemented >> > type (by the library itself) is a good idea since these warnings are >> > visible to users/app developers and they are useless for them. >> >> Agreed, the way we deal with the XML docs ensures we preserve >> any parts of the DOM we don't know about. IMHO we should only >> emit a warning if there is a bit of the DOM we don't expect >> and we are loosing that data during the requested manipulation. > > I'll change these warnings to g_debug then
OK, I'll put this on my TODO list then so we don't forget. :) -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list