On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cferg...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:08:10PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 11:38:15PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cferg...@redhat.com> 
>> > wrote:
>> > > There are some devices which we are not able to parse yet, in these
>> > > cases a runtime warning is printed to tell what's going on.
>> >
>> >   Actually I see that most of the device types are not being handled.
>> > I would suggest we implement all the cases before merging this or
>> > otherwise we'll easily forget about this. Yes the warning won't let us
>> > forget but I don't think emitting a warning for each unimplemented
>> > type (by the library itself) is a good idea since these warnings are
>> > visible to users/app developers and they are useless for them.
>>
>> Agreed, the way we deal with the XML docs ensures we preserve
>> any parts of the DOM we don't know about. IMHO we should only
>> emit a warning if there is a bit of the DOM we don't expect
>> and we are loosing that data during the requested manipulation.
>
> I'll change these warnings to g_debug then

  OK, I'll put this on my TODO list then so we don't forget. :)


-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to