On 01/23/2012 05:05 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> Add kvmclock timer to documentation, schema and parsers. Keep the
> platform timer first since it is kind of special, and alphabetize
> the others when possible (i.e. when it does not change the ABI).
Any chance the "clock" part in "kvmclock" is redundant since we're setting a
timer? I'm not suggesting either way, I'm just asking whether it would make
sense to name the new timer "kvm" instead of "kvmclock".
I think it's worthwhile to be consistent with the no-kvmclock and
clock=kvm-clock kernel command line options. Which are inconsistent
between themselves. :)
Paolo
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
