On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 08:18:38AM +0100, Philipp Hahn wrote: > Your changed version only has the same behaviour, if the user-passed-in > function iter_func() never changes it->next, which you can't guarentee here. > You need to keep the "next" copy.
Yes, the for loop was changed to a while loop recently exactly for that purpose: commit e1c15dac18fd5fc3d7c2cbfebb0402c05cc3cee3 http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt-glib.git;a=commit;h=e1c15dac18fd5fc3d7c2cbfebb0402c05cc3cee3 Refactor gvir_config_object_delete_child By changing gvir_config_xml_foreach_child to make it robust against current node deletion in the "foreach" callback, we can use gvir_config_object_foreach_child to implement gvir_config_object_delete_child Christophe
pgpkllNXeRmnn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
