On 26.01.2012 12:47, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 05:56:19PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> Currently, we support only filling a volume with zeroes on wiping. >> However, it is not enough as data might still be readable by >> experienced and equipped attacker. Many technical papers have been >> written, therefore we should support other wiping algorithms. >> --- >> diff to v1: >> -Daniel's suggestions taken in (notably, moved to new API) >> configure.ac | 27 ++++++++++- >> include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in | 30 ++++++++++++ >> src/driver.h | 5 ++ >> src/libvirt.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++ >> src/libvirt_public.syms | 5 ++ >> src/remote/remote_driver.c | 1 + >> src/remote/remote_protocol.x | 9 +++- >> src/remote_protocol-structs | 6 ++ >> src/storage/storage_driver.c | 105 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- >> tools/virsh.c | 37 +++++++++++++-- >> tools/virsh.pod | 26 ++++++++++- >> 11 files changed, 271 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > Sorry I missed this before - it is better to start a new top level > thread, and include "v2" in the subject line to make it stand out, > otherwise it gets threaded in with old archived mail.
Yeah, I've noticed after I sent the e-mail. Sorry for that. > > ACK if those minor fixes are done + obvious rebase conflict resolution > > Fixed, rebased and pushed. Thanks. Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
