On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > In general I agree with the patch series dropping g_error() in favour > of normal GError reporting, so programs can cope with errors. > > However, it removes the forced logging and it's too easy for the > caller to ignore them, making it hard to track down when something > goes wrong. > > I think this is even more relevant, because libvirt-glib is logging > *tons* of normal/useless runtime messages, and now we are making > silent the error messages. I would strongly prefer the other way > around.
I think one way of solving that issue would be to use g_warning (withing libvirt-glib domains) when calling gvir_error_new_literal(). For the rest of the messages, I will eventually send patches to remove/lower the one I am unhappy with that really clutter a debugging session. -- Marc-André Lureau -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
