On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 03:20:45PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > I know I'm a bit late to the party (I missed your mail before), but > would it have been possible to do the "default" processing in the caller > rather than in the parsing function itself?
I cannot disagree since I was not sure at all that this was the right place for setting defaults, I should have mentioned this explicitly when sending the patch.. Who is "the caller" exactly in this case? Thanks, Christophe
pgp2qVMgVs7SJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
