Il 06/04/2012 06:36, Eric Blake ha scritto: > If only qemu could get 'drive-reopen' inside 'transaction'...
Just a quick answer to this: if qemu could get 'drive-reopen' inside 'transaction', the standalone command could be made safe just as easily. In fact, in QEMU 1.1 the blockdev-snapshot-sync command got a similar treatment: it became transactionable, _and_ the standalone command became a simple wrapper around a 1-command transaction. Paolo -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
