On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:24:42AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:47:46AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > > Hey, > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:38:36PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:31:55PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > > > Triggered by http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667683 > > > > --- > > > > If this looks correct I'll have a look at libvirt-glib and > > > > libvirt-gobject too. > > > > > > Doing this would break ABI. We should just make sure future symbols > > > are added in the right place > > > > I thought that until we decide we'll attempt to be ABI stable, we'd be > > raising the symbols version number before every release if there has been > > any new symbols, thus breaking ABI. It seems this hasn't been done in a > > while :-/ > > Oh wait yes. I was getting mixed up with libosinfo, which we decided was > ABI stable. We can still update libvirt-glib
Maybe we could start paying attention to symbol versioning, and raise soname when we really break ABI Christophe
pgpBaWNgLGL3R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
