On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 05:19:33PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > The concept of 'default usb controllers' seems very policy based > to me & different hypervisors will have different views of this. > > So IMHO we should not add this API
I'm fine with dropping the patch. My feeling was that this API had a bit too much policy in it, but that it can be quite helpful. I guess now I have to replace it with actual API documentation for GVirConfigDomainControllerUsb so that people know they should not copy&paste all of what is done in the test program. Christophe
pgptrVRgWYHF3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
