On 07/09/2012 02:44 PM, Guannan Ren wrote:
On 07/08/2012 06:53 PM, Guannan Ren wrote:
The set of patches aims to three kind of jobs.
First, for SRV RR, in order to strictly comform to RFC 2782, the patch
changed and upgraded codes in following parts.
The format of SRV RR:
_Service._Proto.Name TTL Class SRV Priority Weight Port Target
1,The protocol and service labels are prepended with an underscore.
e.g: _ldap._tcp.example.com
2,The range of Port,Priority,Weight is 0-65535.
3,A Target of "." means that the service is decidedly not
available at this domain.
Also, trying to invoke dnsmasq command line based on its manpage.
--srv-host=<_service>.<_prot>.[<domain>],[<target>[,<port>[,<priority>[,<weight>]]]]
_service and protocol are mandatory options.
The reset of them are optional.
When the target is not given in dnsmasq, it comform to the third
item above.
For TXT RR, we changed the text field from mandatory to optional
based on
dnsmasq manpage:
--txt-record=<name>[[,<text>],<text>]
Second, changed the way of dns element as well as its children
elements parsing via
virXPathNodeSet(). It has advantages when multiple children
elements there is.
Third, fixed related bug and unexposed bugs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836326
Hi,
Ping, anyone would like to review the patchset.
The codes strictly conforms to AFC 2782 and dnsmasq manpage. :)
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2782.txt
Guannan Ren
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
