On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 16:52:41 -0400 Corey Bryant <cor...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > On 08/08/2012 04:48 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:07:02 -0400 > > Corey Bryant <cor...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 08/07/2012 06:16 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > >>> On 08/07/2012 11:07 AM, Corey Bryant wrote: > >>> > >>>>>> +# > >>>>>> +# Since: 1.2.0 > >>>>> > >>>>> We're not very consistent on '1.2' vs. '1.2.0' in since listings, but > >>>>> that's probably worth a global cleanup closer to hard freeze. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> I'll make a note of it. Or does Luiz usually do a cleanup? > >>> > >>> No idea. > >>> > >> > >> Luiz, were you planning to take a pass at cleaning up the "since" > >> release? If not let me know and I can submit a patch. Just let me know > >> which to use, '1.2' or '1.2.0'. > > > > I'd appreciate it if you submit a patch. I guess we should use 1.2.0. > > > > Sure I'll do that. > > Btw, should I be using error_set(errp, ERROR_CLASS_GENERIC_ERROR, "...") > and have a dependency on your patch series? Or should I stick with the > old error messages? That would preferable, yes. Specially if you're adding new errors. But I'm not exactly sure when my series will be merged, this depends on what review will bring. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
