On 08/17/2012 09:34 AM, Osier Yang wrote: > Setting hard_limit larger than previous swap_hard_limit must fail, > it's not that good if one wants to change the swap_hard_limit > and hard_limit together. E.g. > > % virsh memtune rhel6 > hard_limit : 1000000 > soft_limit : 1000000 > swap_hard_limit: 1000000 > > % virsh memtune rhel6 --hard-limit 1000020 --soft-limit 1000020 \ > --swap-hard-limit 1000020 --live > > This patch reorder the limits setting to set the swap_hard_limit > first, hard_limit then, and soft_limit last if it's greater than > current swap_hard_limit. And soft_limit first, hard_limit then, > swap_hard_limit last, if not. > ---
Looks good + works good = ACK ;-) Martin -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
