On 09/04/2012 08:57 AM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: >>From bafcb4ed2b90b5ba845ca6b61861e3caa548b16a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <jas...@humppa.nl> > Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 16:57:09 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Include some extra headers needed for OpenBSD. > > --- > src/util/virnetdevbridge.c | 9 +++++++++ > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Please show the compiler errors that you got without these includes. I can't help but wonder if you have instead uncovered a bug in the gnulib headers, but knowing which symbols were not declared makes a difference in answering that question. > > diff --git a/src/util/virnetdevbridge.c b/src/util/virnetdevbridge.c > index 7b11bee..8559223 100644 > --- a/src/util/virnetdevbridge.c > +++ b/src/util/virnetdevbridge.c > @@ -30,6 +30,15 @@ > #include "intprops.h" > > #include <sys/ioctl.h> > + > +#ifdef HAVE_SYS_PARAM_H <sys/param.h> is non-standard; what are we using that requires us to probe for its existence? Should gnulib consider guaranteeing this header in spite of it being non-standard? > +# include <sys/param.h> > +#endif > + > +#ifdef HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H This line shouldn't be necessary; gnulib guarantees a working <sys/socket.h> on all architectures. -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
