On 09/05/2012 10:52 AM, Eric Blake wrote:

>> +        for (i = 0; i < npoolTypes; i++) {
>> +            if ((poolType = virStoragePoolTypeFromString(poolTypes[i])) < 
>> 0) {
>> +                vshError(ctl, "%s", _("Invalid pool type"));
> 
> Hmm.  What happens if we add new pool types in the future?  If libvirt
> 0.10.3 supports the new pool type 'foo', but I am connecting with virsh
> 0.10.2 as the client, then I am unable to specify the pool type, even
> though it is valid to the server.  But I don't have any good suggestions
> on how to make the full list of supported pool types available, and
> which bits they map to, unless we do something like add a new API to
> return a list of supported pool types and then have this virsh function
> consult that list instead of hard-coding the list at the time of the
> libvirt release when virsh was compiled.  Probably not worth the effort.

Or maybe instead of a new API, we reuse existing capability XML to
expose the full list of supported pool types as a capability.  I know
I'd also like capability XML to show the supported names of
domxml-{to,from}-native transformations possible for a given driver.

-- 
Eric Blake   ebl...@redhat.com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to