On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:09:22PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 08:24:05PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > In addition to the preformatted text line, pass the raw message as well, > > to allow the output functions to use a different output format. > > > > This patch only changes the interface and callers, an output function > > that takes advantage of this will follow. > > > > Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmač <m...@redhat.com> > > --- > > src/util/logging.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- > > src/util/logging.h | 3 ++- > > tests/testutils.c | 1 + > > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > Independantly of my opinion of the patch series in general, > I think something like this patch is worthwhile. I would > take a slightly different approach though. Instead of passing > the rawstr + str into the output functions, I'd only pass the > rawstr, and actually move the virLogFormatString() call down > into the output functions, instead of virLogVMessage
Urgh, sadly this turns out to not be practical because we need to populate the in memory log buffer with the data. So ACK to this patch - I'll apply it now. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
