On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 03:35:27PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 16:35:05 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:13:24PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > > diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.h b/src/conf/domain_conf.h > > > index fa5d1f4..3cb1193 100644 > > > --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.h > > > +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.h > > > @@ -386,6 +386,7 @@ struct _virDomainHostdevDef { > > > int mode; /* enum virDomainHostdevMode */ > > > int startupPolicy; /* enum virDomainStartupPolicy */ > > > unsigned int managed : 1; > > > + unsigned int missing : 1; > > > union { > > > virDomainHostdevSubsys subsys; > > > struct { > > > > I was wondering if we should actually expose this in the > > XML, as a read-only attribute, only shown when requesting > > the live XML. Otherwise there's no way for an application > > to determine whether the USB device they requested was > > actually given to the guest, without looking inside the > > guest. > > Yeah, this sounds like a useful thing. Could that be a follow up patch to > avoid holding up the whole series just for this? :-)
As long as we do the followup now, I'm fine with it being separate. Just don't want us to release anything without it. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list