On 2012年11月21日 21:20, Peter Krempa wrote:
On 11/21/12 04:22, Osier Yang wrote:
Regression introduced by commit 258e06c85b7, "ret" could be set to 1
or 0 by virStorageBackendFileSystemIsMounted before goto cleanup.
This could mislead the callers (up to the public API
virStoragePoolDestroy) to return success even the underlying umount
command fails.
---
src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c
b/src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c
index 10daee3..cbcbe34 100644
--- a/src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c
+++ b/src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c
@@ -449,6 +449,7 @@ static int
virStorageBackendFileSystemUnmount(virStoragePoolObjPtr pool) {
virCommandPtr cmd = NULL;
int ret = -1;
+ int rc;
if (pool->def->type == VIR_STORAGE_POOL_NETFS) {
if (pool->def->source.nhost != 1) {
@@ -475,8 +476,8 @@
virStorageBackendFileSystemUnmount(virStoragePoolObjPtr pool) {
}
/* Short-circuit if already unmounted */
- if ((ret = virStorageBackendFileSystemIsMounted(pool)) != 1) {
- if (ret < 0)
+ if ((rc = virStorageBackendFileSystemIsMounted(pool)) != 1) {
+ if (rc < 0)
This if statement is redundant and could be replaced with
return rc;
return -1;
else
return 0;
ACK with that change.
Peter
Thanks, pushed with the change.
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
