On 12/07/2012 06:27 AM, Peter Krempa wrote: > On 12/07/12 14:19, Gao Yongwei wrote: >> >> >> 2012/12/7 Peter Krempa <pkre...@redhat.com <mailto:pkre...@redhat.com>> >> > > [...] > >> >> I think, if a vm is marked has autodestroyed,then this means that we do >> not need this vm again on next reboot.? if so,what's the reason for us >> to save this vm? >> if we want to save it,why we marked it has autodestroyed? ^ ^ > > Well, autodestroy means that the guest is destroyed when the current > libvirt connection (the connection that started the guest) is > terminated. I don't see any reason why the user shouldn't be allowed to > save the guest if he explicitly wishes to do so.
The decision to forbid saving autodestroy guests was an intentional design decision. If you don't want the guest to survive a libvirtd restart, then you should not need to save the guest for any other reason, either. NACK to this patch. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
