On 21.12.2012 17:01, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 21.12.2012 16:52, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 04:49:37PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: >>> This is just a free function for array of virDomainInterfacePtr as >>> returned by virDomainInterfacesAddresses API. >>> --- >>> include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in | 3 +++ >>> python/generator.py | 1 + >>> src/libvirt.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> src/libvirt_public.syms | 1 + >>> 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in b/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in >>> index 3eb7ced..d40c4f8 100644 >>> --- a/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in >>> +++ b/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in >>> @@ -4613,6 +4613,9 @@ int virDomainInterfacesAddresses(virDomainPtr domain, >>> unsigned int method, >>> unsigned int flags); >>> >>> +void virDomainInterfaceFree(virDomainInterfacePtr ifaces, >>> + int count); >> >> Ewww, no. Please just have >> >> void virDomainInterfaceFree(virDomainInterfacePtr iface); >> >> Daniel >> > > You mean to free just one item within an array? So users should do: > > for (i = 0; i < ifaces_count; i++) > virDomainInterfaceFree(ifaces[i]); > VIR_FREE(ifaces) > > then? Why would we want to enforce them to do something like that? > (I am not saying you approach is bad, I just don't understand it) >
Aah. Now, after I read your reply to 1/8 I understand. Okay, I think I can do that. > Michal > > -- > libvir-list mailing list > libvir-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list > -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
