On 12/20/2012 05:01 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote: > The cpu_map.xml file is there to separate CPU model definitions from the > code. Having the only interesting data for PowerPC models only in the > source code. This patch moves this data to the XML file and removes the > hardcoded list completely. > --- > src/cpu/cpu_map.xml | 5 ++ > src/cpu/cpu_powerpc.c | 161 > ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------- > 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml b/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml > index ba8c17d..6d51283 100644 > --- a/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml > +++ b/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml > @@ -591,12 +591,17 @@ > <!-- IBM-based CPU models --> > <model name='POWER7'> > <vendor name='IBM'/> > + <pvr value='0x003f0200'/> > </model>
Do we have an RNG schema for cpu_map.xml? Should we?
> @@ -260,26 +209,29 @@ ppcModelLoad(xmlXPathContextPtr ctxt,
> }
> }
>
> - if (map->models == NULL)
> + if (!virXPathBoolean("boolean(./pvr)", ctxt) ||
Is this call to virXPathBoolean necessary? If the element doesn't exist,
> + virXPathULongHex("string(./pvr/@value)", ctxt, &pvr) < 0) {
then isn't this call to virXPathULongHex guaranteed to fail, without
wasting time on the first query?
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
> + _("Missing or invalid PVR value in CPU model %s"),
> + model->name);
> + goto ignore;
> + }
> + model->data.pvr = pvr;
> +
> + if (map->models == NULL) {
> map->models = model;
> - else {
Nice cleanup of style violation along the way.
ACK.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
