在 2013-01-08二的 08:51 +0000，Daniel P. Berrange写道：
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 04:47:40PM +0800, li guang wrote:
> > 在 2013-01-08二的 16:37 +0800，li guang写道：
> > > 在 2013-01-08二的 08:04 +0000，Daniel P. Berrange写道：
> > > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:58:49AM +0800, liguang wrote:
> > > > > Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > src/conf/device_conf.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> > > > > src/conf/device_conf.h | 1 +
> > > > > src/conf/domain_conf.c | 5 ++++-
> > > > > src/conf/domain_conf.h | 1 +
> > > > > 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/src/conf/device_conf.c b/src/conf/device_conf.c
> > > > > index 7b97f45..1c06ed0 100644
> > > > > --- a/src/conf/device_conf.c
> > > > > +++ b/src/conf/device_conf.c
> > > > > @@ -51,16 +51,18 @@ int
> > > > > virDevicePCIAddressParseXML(xmlNodePtr node,
> > > > > virDevicePCIAddressPtr addr)
> > > > > {
> > > > > - char *domain, *slot, *bus, *function, *multi;
> > > > > + char *domain, *slot, *bus, *function, *multi, *bridge;
> > > > > int ret = -1;
> > > > >
> > > > > memset(addr, 0, sizeof(*addr));
> > > > > + addr->bridge = -1;
> > > > >
> > > > > domain = virXMLPropString(node, "domain");
> > > > > bus = virXMLPropString(node, "bus");
> > > > > slot = virXMLPropString(node, "slot");
> > > > > function = virXMLPropString(node, "function");
> > > > > multi = virXMLPropString(node, "multifunction");
> > > > > + bridge = virXMLPropString(node, "bridge");
> > > > >
> > > > > if (domain &&
> > > > > virStrToLong_ui(domain, NULL, 0, &addr->domain) < 0) {
> > > > > @@ -98,6 +100,14 @@ virDevicePCIAddressParseXML(xmlNodePtr node,
> > > > > goto cleanup;
> > > > >
> > > > > }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (bridge &&
> > > > > + virStrToLong_i(bridge, NULL, 0, &addr->bridge) < 0) {
> > > > > + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> > > > > + _("pci-bridge number must be >= 0 "));
> > > > > + goto cleanup;
> > > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > This is bogus - there's no need for a new 'bridge' attribute - we
> > > > have 'bus' which is sufficient.
> > >
> > > Oh, yes, this version 'bridge' is unnecessary.
> > >
> > > In former version, I want to discriminate if a pci device want to
> > > sitting on default bus pci.0 or pci-bridge0, so bring in 'bridge'.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> >
> > but, without 'bridge', can't know if user want or don't want pci-bridge,
> > and the check for 'bus != 0' will be removed, then if user happened to
> > define a pci device greater than 0, qemu will complain about this,
> > so it's inconvenient for this case.
>
> The check for 'bus != 0' was only added because we didn't have any
> support for bridges. Once we have bridge support, then that check
> can be changed. If bus != 0, then check to see if there's a matching
> bridge device, otherwise raise an error.
OK for me, though it seems much more changes will be involved
than with 'bridge' condition.
>
> Daniel
--
regards!
li guang
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
