On 03/01/2013 03:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> >> So the conclusion is that I see no extra harm in calling nl_geterror(). ACK. > > Except the API signature is different, so my patch won't work with > both versions :-(
Sounds like its time for a wrapper function that #ifdefs away the difference in underlying API calls between libnl1 and libnl3, with the bulk of our code using our wrapper instead of direct nl_* functions. And by the time we convert our code to all go through our wrappers, how much simpler is it to have our wrapper do the direct socket work instead of catering to two parallel nl_ abstractions? -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
