On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:36:03PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: > The 1.0.3 release was on the 5th March, and right now we have > accumulated 'only' 150 commits since the release. Based on this I > would suggest to wait a couple of weeks before to enter a freeze > for the following release. This mean we drift from the usual end > of month, but the ratio of freeze/devel will remain more or less > constant as well as the expected size of change in the new release. > So if this is fine I would suggest to enter freeze for 1.0.4 > on the 5th of April for a release around the 12. Unless there is > a reason to push a release earlier,
I would prefer it if we just stuck to a release on/near April 1st regardless of how many changes have accumulated. IMHO a predictable release date once a month on/near 1st of the month is more important than the amount of code that has been changed. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
