On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 06:34:38AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/03/2013 06:15 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berra...@redhat.com>
> >
> > The lockd plugin for the lock manager was not correctly
> > handling the release of resource locks. This meant that
> > during migration, or when pausing a VM, the locks would
> > not get released. This in turn made it impossible to
> > resume the domain, or finish migration
> > ---
> > src/locking/lock_driver_lockd.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/locking/lock_driver_lockd.c
> > b/src/locking/lock_driver_lockd.c
>
> > -
> > - if (virNetClientProgramCall(program,
> > - client,
> > - counter++,
> > -
> > VIR_LOCK_SPACE_PROTOCOL_PROC_RELEASE_RESOURCE,
> > - 0, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> > -
> > (xdrproc_t)xdr_virLockSpaceProtocolReleaseResourceArgs, &args,
> > - (xdrproc_t)xdr_void, NULL) < 0)
>
> So the old code released the first resource,
>
> > - goto cleanup;
> > + for (i = 0 ; i < priv->nresources ; i++) {
>
> but the new code loops over all resources. Yeah, I could see how that
> causes a problem if more than one resource is held.
Actually the old code didn't release any resources since it failed to
fill in the resname field.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
