Hmm, It seems to be working (after only simple tests). -- Dominik
2013/5/21 Ján Tomko <jto...@redhat.com> > On 05/21/2013 01:37 PM, Laine Stump wrote: > > On 05/21/2013 04:03 AM, Ján Tomko wrote: > >> On 05/21/2013 09:32 AM, Dominik Mostowiec wrote: > >>> hi, > >>> I try to add 2 VF by "hostdev". > >>> Networks (vnet0, vnet1) with: > >>> <forward mode='hostdev' managed='yes'> > >>> <pf dev='eth1'/> > >>> ..... > >>> > >>> Domain: > >>> <interface type="network"> > >>> <source network="vnet0"/> > >>> .... > >>> <interface type="network"> > >>> <source network="vnet1"/> > >>> .... > >>> > >>> virsh create error: > >>> "error: internal error process exited while connecting to monitor: kvm: > >>> -device > pci-assign,configfd=25,host=01:10.1,id=hostdev0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4: > >>> Duplicate ID 'hostdev0' for device" > >>> > >> Hi, > >> > >> it seems we have been assigning the same id to all network hostdevs > until this > >> recent commit (not yet released): > >> > >> http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commitdiff;h=6597cc25 > > > > > > If that patch has such an effect, it's purely accidental. Have you > > tested this? (I plan to test a before and after as soon as I've had > > breakfast) > > > > I haven't tested it and looking at the code again, I might've been wrong :( > > Sorry about that. > > Jan > > > > -- Pozdrawiam Dominik
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list