On 08/16/2013 09:46 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 02:43 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
...
>> diff --git a/tools/virsh-secret.c b/tools/virsh-secret.c
>> index 9d34c1a..30027fe 100644
>> --- a/tools/virsh-secret.c
>> +++ b/tools/virsh-secret.c
...
>> + int usageType = virSecretGetUsageType(sec);
>> + const char *usageStr = virSecretUsageTypeTypeToString(usageType);
>> char uuid[VIR_UUID_STRING_BUFLEN];
>> +
>> if (virSecretGetUUIDString(list->secrets[i], uuid) < 0) {
>> vshError(ctl, "%s", _("Failed to get uuid of secret"));
>> goto cleanup;
>> }
>>
>> - if (usageType) {
>> + if (usageType > VIR_SECRET_USAGE_TYPE_NONE &&
>
>> + usageType < VIR_SECRET_USAGE_TYPE_LAST) {
>
> This condition seems redundant.
>
Hmm. right. Don't think the range check is necessary at all since NONE
is zero, then "if (usageType) {" should be sufficient. I've removed the
extraneous check.
John
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
