On 08/20/2013 11:10 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: > Since 16bcb3 we have a regression. The hard_limit is set > unconditionally. By default, the limit is zero. Hence, if user hasn't > configured any, we set the zero in cgroup subsystem making the kernel > kill the corresponding qemu process immediately. The proper fix is to > set hard_limit iff user has configure any. > --- > src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c b/src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c > index 9673e8e..e27945e 100644 > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c > @@ -428,7 +428,8 @@ qemuSetupMemoryCgroup(virDomainObjPtr vm) > } > } > > - if (virCgroupSetMemoryHardLimit(priv->cgroup, vm->def->mem.hard_limit) < > 0) > + if (vm->def->mem.hard_limit != 0 && > + virCgroupSetMemoryHardLimit(priv->cgroup, vm->def->mem.hard_limit) < > 0) > return -1; > > if (vm->def->mem.soft_limit != 0 && >
This still calls SetMaxMemLock with 0 if mem.hard_limit is 0. According to commit 9395894 [1], it seems this won't be enough for VFIO passthrough (although I haven't tested it). (Commit 6d8ebc7 [2] changed this to use qemuDomainMemoryLimit) Jan [1] http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commitdiff;h=9395894 [2] http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commitdiff;h=6d8ebc7 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
