On 27.08.2013 14:03, Laine Stump wrote: > On 08/26/2013 09:39 AM, Ján Tomko wrote: >> If the network has not been found, virNetworkFree(NULL) >> was called, resulting in an extra error: >> error: invalid network pointer in virNetworkFree > > > The patch is okay, but all vir*Free() functions should be NOPs when the > argument is NULL.
Just internal vir*Free() functions behave that way. The public ones, like virNetworkFree() don't. I was thinking a while ago why we have different approach like this, but the thought got buried under other stuff. Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
