On 13-09-23 02:27 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
If you disagree with this approach (that is: if you think that "224.0.0.0/24" here is not gradual improvement but a step in the wrong direction),
Of course I'm not saying that. I think that's pretty clear. The only point we disagree on is the size of the network range, not the implementation of the feature so by definition of course your patch is a good initial improvement and should continue on that path.
If somebody really needs to come along afterward as a separate effort and expand the range (or at least be able to leverage your work to do so in their own private builds) then that can happen.
Cheers, b. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
