On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:42:13AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/02/2013 11:09 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: > > Right now, we are testing qemuMonitorSystemPowerdown instead of > > qemuMonitorJSONSystemPowerdown. It makes no harm, as both functions have > > the same header and the former is just a wrapper over the latter. But we > > should be consistent as we're testing the JSON functions only in here. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com> > > --- > > tests/qemumonitorjsontest.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Actually, I think we should do the opposite, and test only the wrapper > functions that the rest of qemu_driver.c and friends will be calling. > For example, testQemuMonitorJSONGetVersion() calls into > qemuMonitorGetVersion, not qemuMonitorJSONGetVersion.
Well this test suite was specifically targetting only the JSON monitor impl, not the text mode impl, so calling the JSON functions is right IMHO. There is separate testing for the text mode monitor Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
