On 01/23/2014 05:37 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > There are a number of pthreads impls available on Win32 > these days, in particular the mingw64 project has a good > impl. Delete the native windows thread implementation and > rely on using pthreads everywhere. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> > --- > configure.ac | 15 +- > src/Makefile.am | 4 - > src/util/virthread.c | 291 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > src/util/virthread.h | 41 ++++- > src/util/virthreadpthread.c | 309 ---------------------------------- > src/util/virthreadpthread.h | 53 ------ > src/util/virthreadwin32.c | 396 > -------------------------------------------- > src/util/virthreadwin32.h | 53 ------ > 8 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 833 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 src/util/virthreadpthread.c > delete mode 100644 src/util/virthreadpthread.h > delete mode 100644 src/util/virthreadwin32.c > delete mode 100644 src/util/virthreadwin32.h
This works for Fedora 20, but is it going to work on F19? What about RHEL (or does RHEL not care about mingw builds?) While I'm in favor of reducing the duplication, I'm wondering if we should still wait a bit longer before assuming winpthreads is reliably available for mingw. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
