Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/03/2014 08:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>   
>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:46:51PM +0100, Claudio Bley wrote:
>>     
>>> At Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:01:47 +0000,
>>> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>       
>>>> ACK, if you also add the virEventUpdateTimeout  method
>>>>         
>>> OK, but why should I add it? It's useless (for the user) and unused by
>>> the wrapping code. I want to keep the JNA library definition clean --
>>> e.g. in a later patch I remove all the *UUIDString functions.
>>>       
>> What makes you say it is useless ?   The UpdateTimeout method lets you
>> alter the timeout value for an existing timer, without having to go
>> through Remove+Add of it. This might seem like a subtle distinction,
>> but the difference is that the UpdateTimeout is guaranteed not to
>> fail, where as Remove+Add may fail.
>>     
>
> In fact, in my recent 'virsh event' additions, I explicitly used code
> that adds a timer with a -1 initial period (never fires),

The libxl driver also temporarily disables timers in this way.

Regards,
Jim

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to