Il 16/06/2014 17:39, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
> No, this is a (backwards-compatible) extension to how the option is parsed.
But numa started appearing on query-command-line-options only after this
patch got applied. It is not the semantics I would expect from
query-command-line-options, but it is a hint that we have a QEMU version
with the new numa option handling code.
Oh, then indeed it's possible. I had forgotten that -numa was using ad
hoc parsing code, not QemuOpts.
> I suppose with QAPI introspection you could check if the QAPI type for -numa
> is defined...
Does this exist, or is it just an idea?
Amos was working on it.
Paolo
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
