Hi,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:01:53PM +0200, Cédric Bosdonnat wrote:
> This code depends on new API in libvirt-gconfig to extract the
> secmodels handled by the host.
> ---
> Diff to v3:
> * Added yet another missing g_object_unref.
> * Fixed the logic for supportsSelinux
> libvirt-sandbox/libvirt-sandbox-builder.c | 49
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libvirt-sandbox/libvirt-sandbox-builder.c
> b/libvirt-sandbox/libvirt-sandbox-builder.c
> index 48b3acc..d6b5735 100644
> --- a/libvirt-sandbox/libvirt-sandbox-builder.c
> +++ b/libvirt-sandbox/libvirt-sandbox-builder.c
> @@ -322,12 +322,10 @@ static gboolean
> gvir_sandbox_builder_construct_devices(GVirSandboxBuilder *build
> return TRUE;
> }
>
> -
> -static gboolean gvir_sandbox_builder_construct_security(GVirSandboxBuilder
> *builder G_GNUC_UNUSED,
> - GVirSandboxConfig
> *config G_GNUC_UNUSED,
> - const gchar
> *statedir G_GNUC_UNUSED,
> - GVirConfigDomain
> *domain,
> - GError **error
> G_GNUC_UNUSED)
> +static gboolean gvir_sandbox_builder_construct_security_selinux
> (GVirSandboxBuilder *builder,
> +
> GVirSandboxConfig *config,
> +
> GVirConfigDomain *domain,
> + GError
> **error)
> {
> GVirConfigDomainSeclabel *sec = gvir_config_domain_seclabel_new();
> const char *label = gvir_sandbox_config_get_security_label(config);
> @@ -360,6 +358,45 @@ static gboolean
> gvir_sandbox_builder_construct_security(GVirSandboxBuilder *buil
> return TRUE;
> }
>
> +static gboolean gvir_sandbox_builder_construct_security(GVirSandboxBuilder
> *builder,
> + GVirSandboxConfig
> *config,
> + const gchar
> *statedir G_GNUC_UNUSED,
> + GVirConfigDomain
> *domain,
> + GError **error)
> +{
> + GVirConnection *connection =
> gvir_sandbox_builder_get_connection(builder);
> + GVirConfigCapabilities *configCapabilities;
> + GVirConfigCapabilitiesHost *hostCapabilities;
> + GList *secmodels, *iter;
> + gboolean supportsSelinux = FALSE;
> +
> + /* What security models are available on the host? */
> + if (!(configCapabilities = gvir_connection_get_capabilities(connection,
> error))) {
Missing g_object_unref(connection); here too.
> + return FALSE;
> + }
> +
> + hostCapabilities = gvir_config_capabilities_get_host(configCapabilities);
> +
> + secmodels =
> gvir_config_capabilities_host_get_secmodels(hostCapabilities);
> + for (iter = secmodels; iter != NULL; iter = iter->next) {
> + if (g_str_equal(gvir_config_capabilities_host_secmodel_get_model(
> + GVIR_CONFIG_CAPABILITIES_HOST_SECMODEL(iter->data)),
> "selinux"))
> + supportsSelinux = TRUE;
> + g_object_unref(iter->data);
> + }
> +
> + g_list_free(secmodels);
> + g_object_unref(hostCapabilities);
> + g_object_unref(configCapabilities);
> + g_object_unref(connection);
> +
> + if (supportsSelinux)
> + return gvir_sandbox_builder_construct_security_selinux(builder,
> config,
> + domain,
> error);
> +
> + return TRUE;
Wondering whether this we should return FALSE when we did nothing
because we only support SELinux.
Patch is fine otherwise, I can squash these changes in before pushing if
you don't want to send yet another iteration ;)
Christophe
pgpIK4BjaJOW5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
