On 07/02/2014 04:15 PM, Bosson VZ wrote: > Thanks in return for the acknowledgement. > > > > I understand that the long-term plan is to reduce the size of the vzkernel > patch and to > only use vanilla kernel primitives Daniel was talking about. That would be an > ideal situation.
Yes, at the kernel level the long term plan is to eventually get rid of vz-specific API and switch to namespaces/cgroups completely. Thus any new users that sit on the vzkernel API make this process ... harder :) > The thing is that we simply cannot wait for this merge to happen. We have > been using OpenVZ > for many years and bossonvz is just a convenient tool for us right now and, > at least, in the > mid-term future. My question is how is the new libcontainer/PCS SDK library > going to influence > the existing vz-tools eco-system? We will keep the CLI (vzctl) and library (libvzctl) working on new OpenVZ installations for some time (several years, I suppose) by making them properly redirect calls to new API. But all the new features will be implemented within the new API, libcontainer/PCS SDK. Thanks, Pavel -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
