On 07/17/2014 08:22 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> Decisions whether qemu driver and libvirt-daemon-{qemu,kvm} packages
> should be built on various OS/arch combinations were scattered around
> the spec file. Let's make it easier to see where qemu driver is going to
> be built.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdene...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  libvirt.spec.in | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in
> index 9c7b241..472fa4b 100644
> --- a/libvirt.spec.in
> +++ b/libvirt.spec.in
> @@ -54,15 +54,27 @@
>  %define with_vbox          0%{!?_without_vbox:%{server_drivers}}
>  
>  %define with_qemu_tcg      %{with_qemu}
> -# Change if we ever provide qemu-kvm binaries on non-x86 hosts
> -%if 0%{?fedora} >= 18
> +
> +%define qemu_kvm_arches %{ix86} x86_64
> +
> +%if 0%{?fedora}
> +    %if 0%{?fedora} < 16
> +        # Fedora doesn't have any QEMU on ppc64 until FC16 - only ppc
> +        %ifarch ppc64
> +            %define with_qemu_tcg 0
> +        %endif
> +    %endif

This may be removed if we come to a conclusion in the other thread about
how much we want to support older Fedora.  But we can clean it up later,
this patch is just moving it.

ACK.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to