On 05/09/2012 01:44 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > I don't now why but the list manager bounced and discarded the > mail from Anthony to this list, so I'm sending it again. > > As stated I'm fine taking over maintainance for the project > (releases, some patch review and commits) but if there is a regain > of activity and someone show commitment I will be fine handing > maintainance over :-) >
Thank you Daniel very much for taking this responsibility. If you need any kind of assistance, please don't hesitate to ask, I will be happy to help whenever possible. > W.r.t. closing the list, I think we need a grace period to allow > people to express dissent if needed (the libvir-list has far more > traffic) and I will send a couple of reminders before closing if there > is no opposition. > Agreed, and I also think it is important to keep the achieves accessible for historic reasons. > I guess the fist thing I will do is push the patch from Klaus > fixing the build with sblim-sfcb, > Indeed. I have a couple of pending patches that were not sent for review which could be interesting to apply before rolling out the last release. Sad news, but the show must go on. :) Best Regards, Eduardo > feedback welcome ! > > Daniel > > ----- Forwarded message from Anthony Liguori <[email protected]> ----- > >> Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 20:46:09 -0500 >> From: Anthony Liguori <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> CC: Daniel Veillard <[email protected]>, Dave Allan <[email protected]> >> Subject: Future of libvirt-cim >> >> Hi, >> >> As some of you may have noticed by the lack of activity on the >> libvirt-cim ML over the past month, we have decided at IBM to focus >> on direct consumption of libvirt and oVirt related interfaces >> meaning that we've stopped actively working on libvirt-cim. >> >> Having discussed it a little bit with DV et al, I think it would >> make sense to close this mailing list and move the traffic to the >> main libvirt as is done with the other libvirt sub projects. >> >> I also think it would make sense to open up commit access to have >> the same rules as the main libvirt repository does. >> >> Does that sound reasonable? >> >> Regards, >> >> Anthony Liguori > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > -- Eduardo de Barros Lima Software Engineer, Open Virtualization Linux Technology Center - IBM/Brazil [email protected] _______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
