On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com>wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 09:19:51AM -0500, Dennis Jenkins wrote: > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com > >wrote: > > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 09:06:36AM -0500, Dennis Jenkins wrote: > > > > http://pastebin.com/nXcNQukz > > > > > > Hmm, so from the logs I'm fairly certain the missing path is the > > > /.oldroot//var/run/libvirt/lxc/dwj-lnx-dev.devpts one, not /dev/pts > > > > > > Can you tell me if any part of '/var/run/libvirt/lxc/' is a symlink > > > to elsewhere ? In particular is '/var/run' a symlink, and if so > > > is it relative or absolute ? > > > > > > > > No symlinks under "/var/run/libvirt", but "/var/run" is a symlink to > "/run". > > > > ostara ~ # file /var/run > > /var/run: symbolic link to `/run' > > Ok, that'll be the problem. When libvirt prepends /.oldroot onto > the path, the symlink keeps pointing to /run instead of to > /.oldroot/run :-( > > On Fedora "/var/run" is a relative symlink to "../run" to avoid > these kinds of problem. > > As a quick workaround you can make your symlink relative too. > > I'll get a fix into the next libvirt release to deal with > absolute symlinks better. > > ostara ~ # cd /var ostara var # rm run; ln -s ../run run ostara var # virsh -c lxc:/// start dwj-lnx-dev Domain dwj-lnx-dev started Yeah. Diagnosis confirmed. Daniel, thank you for your assistance.
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
