❦ 25 juillet 2016 08:44 CEST, Martin Kletzander <[email protected]> :
>>> "Just a vnet interface, no bridge" means you want no network. Where
>>> should the vnet be connected?
>>
>>The host is able to handle the routing. It seems I could just declare an
>>interface of type "ethernet" instead of "network" to get the effect I
>>want.
>
> I'm sorry, but I have no idea what is the end result you are trying to
> achieve. Could you describe what are your trying to set up without
> libvirt technicalities?
I have a process watching libvirt event to add a route like "ip route
add 192.0.2.147/32 dev vnet18" once the VM is spawned. The host is then
responsible for any routing to/from the VM. I don't want the VM to be
part of a bridge.
--
Indent to show the logical structure of a program.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
