"John J. Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does LWP do the right thing with redirects and RFC 2965 cookies? I don't
I thought it did. > think so (because I presume it would be in HTTP::Cookies if it were there > at all). > > I suppose there should really be, in addition to the 2965 rules, an > equivalent to Netscape's 'Accept only cookies that get sent back to the > originating server', for netscape cookies (ie. an option to block setting > of cookies from, for example, doubleclick.com when you're visiting some > other site). Perhaps such an option could simply apply the 2965 rules to > all cookies? So what does LWP do wrong? Are you saying that it does send doubleclick.com cookies to other sites? --Gisle
