On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 06:03:05AM -0700, Gisle Aas said:
> You could just shorten it to something 'LWP::TimedHTTP'. I don't
> think there is a need to be in the LWP::Protocol namespace. One risk
> of using the LWP namespace is that you might end up in conflict with a
> name LWP wants to use later. One possiblity here is to start using a
> namespace like LWPx (similar to DBIx) for such independent addons.
Ok, advice taken on board, docs written, tests concocted (using
HTTP::Daemon, fork and sleep(1) which feels mildly naughty but seems to
work) and as a result ...
http://thegestalt.org/simon/perl/LWPx-TimedHTTP-1.0.tar.gz
if people could have a look at this and let me know what they think then
that'd be super, funky and, indeed, cool.
