Yeah, I think this is probably the right solution after playing some
more
myself. I think I was suffering from premature optimization, trying to
avoid creating another object.
Thanks!
-Ashley
On Wednesday, December 21, 2005, at 01:24 PM, Gisle Aas wrote:
apv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
D'oh, sorry, just realized that proposed sub change is useless. So,
please ignore that part. Still looking for ideas to make the rewind
work though.
Why not just create a new parser object for the same string?
--Gisle
