On Thu, 04 May 2006 11:03:22 -0700, Gisle Aas wrote: > Or just use Ethereal or a similar network sniffer program. That's > what I currently use and the main reason I have not bothered with > conns() calls for any recent code. They are not completely free for > those that don't try to turn on this debugging either, so I would > prefer to leave it like this.
An extra subroutine call, hash lookup, and boolean comparison per read() and write() is onerous? The debug-conns interface is appealingly clean. Can we save it? -- Peter Scott
