I am the author of a library that is licensed under the LGPL 2.1. It's very clear that a closed source work can dynamically link to the library. That's easy to understand. There are 2 other scenarios however that I am unclear about:
1. Can a LGPL 2.1 dynamically link to an APL 2.0 library or binary? 2. Can an APL 2.0 binary dynamically link to a LGPL 2.1 library? I did a lot of searching on the web first and couldn't find anything covering this. Thanks in advance to whoever replies. -- Bryan <><
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
