On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 5:06 PM Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 2:00 PM Christine Hall <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> as long as there are permissive licenses, the enterprise is quite happy >> with the way things are. > > > Well, obviously, it's restrictive licenses they want from us now. And they > can have them from Polyform and co., we don't and can't restrict anyone from > using the license of their choice on their own work. Just please don't call > them Open Source.
Mostly agree. Although s/restrictive/copyleft/ is more what I think they ultimately need. It will be an expensive lesson. And as long as OSI is a 501(c)(3) then I hope they combat license proliferation, since it's very obviously _NOT_ in the public good. Thanks! _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
