On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 9:26 AM Alexander Terekhov <[email protected]> wrote:
> other than the long established doctrine of "first sale" regarding which > all copylefters are in deep denial > The question is far from simple or long-established with regard to works that are intrinsically copied as part of their distribution, which includes many literary and musical works. WP has an excellent discussion of the issues with many references to court cases. Speaking of which, it's no use quoting statutes and treaties as if they meant something. In common-law countries, *meaning* exists not in the words, but solely in the way judges interpret them. This is most strongly true in the U.S., where there is no notion analogous to the supremacy of Parliament. John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan [email protected] So they play that [tune] on their fascist banjos, eh? --Great-Souled Sam
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
