> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Fontana <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 9:32 AM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [License-discuss] CPAL 1.0 License | Badge-ware | Clarification > > I wouldn't consider 4-clause BSD to be badgeware. Badgeware, to me, refers > to a license that requires display of some sort of sufficiently-annoying > branding or graphical attribution in the user interface of the software. > > FSF has recognized some arguably-badgeware licenses as free software > licenses, such as CPAL. > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#CPAL
Yes, I probably should have said badgeware-ish wrt BSD-4. It's just that they are a bit more specific on the problems in BSD-4's "attribution" requirements than they are on CPAL. _______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
